News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sal32647

03/23/15 12:24 PM

#23328 RE: ksuave #23325

Sure does make sense without the if.
icon url

ksviking12

03/23/15 12:36 PM

#23329 RE: ksuave #23325

The last court victory reinforced that JnJ did not hold the 105 patent. JnJ also admitted that they never had a patent in the USPTO hearing, which is available for any to listen. So, what reason would there be for DECN to now stop being allowed to produce and distribute Genstrip50?
icon url

Leirum

03/23/15 12:42 PM

#23331 RE: ksuave #23325

I think it is not any longer about survival, this Point is cleared.

Patent exhaustion:
stopping the enemy
at the gate
There are useful measures to protect inventions in durable and
non-durable goods against parallel imports, says Susan Pan


http://www.sughrue.com/files/Publication/e2102668-3eea-4779-a633-7f1e6fb30230/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/8c039f86-839c-40f0-a1ef-80c0f7be1b16/90003000SuanPanMay2014.pdf



“The Federal Circuit’s decision
in Lifescan Scotland, Ltd v
Shasta Tech, LLC summarises
Supreme Court precedent related
to exhaustion of both apparatus
patents and method patents.”
icon url

shadolane

03/23/15 1:09 PM

#23334 RE: ksuave #23325

Speaking of court issues wasn't there something going on today? I recall reading that.

Thanks