Re: Customer demand up to this point has not been broad, but we have seen renewed interest in the last six months
This was my original post, that started this discussion. This is how my post began:
The third Itanium:
Two years after the release of the first 64-bit Itanium (code named Merced) and 1 year after the release of Itanium II (code named McKinley) the third version of Itanium is about to be released (code named Madison).
You whine about FUD because I pointed out that Itanium I and Itanium II didn't do very well, so the new one coming out had better be good? And back it up with a quote that says demand, so far, "has not been broad?".
You're posting links that confirm what you're calling "FUD!"