Replies to post #5317 on JUPITER Global Holdings fka JPHC

[irockupet]

It's very expensive to do so. Very true. Especially for a company enbroiled in legal battles and not able to even afford liability insurance on their products and for their procedures.

This is where you know you're f*cked. I hope you get out at the price you want. But waiting is only getting worse. To hold anregistered share is to hold nothing. That's the truth, Loyola has a handful of pinksheet companies in their portfolio of representation. They are a typical firm that pumps and dumps. You know this, but play off to everyone else like you don't think this every occurs. APOA is hurt bad, that's the truth, and there isn't going to be a massive profit for common stock, likely (and this you know too) is zero.

[im a survivor]

LOL...first, what makes you think I have NOT called Loyola...secondly give me one reason to believe what they say? They dont have the best history either and are known to stick with stinky penny's ...and how many other companies have they lied about?

<<Unregistered shares are the same thing as restricted.>>

Are they really? Hmm, id that what Loyola told you? And you wonder why I wouldn't believe a word they say?

I could post the definition of UNREGISTERED and RESTRICTED shares right from the sec website, or any other number of sites...and isnt it odd how they have 2 seperate definitions...but you want me to believe BS some flunky is saying over the phone, instead of actual facts direct from the sec website?? LOL...Very funny!!!


<<Do some DD for once. YOur a amateur for sure.>>

Nice try, but try again.....I havent done any DD? LOL..Um, I and maybe 1 other poster are the only ones doing true dd and posting 100% facts pulled from sec filings..I have had attorney's look this deal over, investment bankes, I have spoken to both companies, IR idiots, the SEC, I have done more dd on this one stock, they you have probably donr on any and every stock you ever invested in combined....

<<Its funny how I call and verify my information and you just guess and post your opinion.>>

Keep the laughs coming, my friend....you must be betting pretty desperate to resort to such blatant and obvious lies...here are the facts..you post pure 100% opinions and BS..you post bogus share counts, you post what some guy us being PAID to tell you over the telephone...all, pure, 100% BS....meanwhile I am the only one to truly dd this deal, histories of both companies, in depth analysis of sec filings and 100% facts.......yet you seem to be a bit basckwards here as it is you whos posts bs and unverified opinions, while I post facts and info pulled directly from sec filings..any idiot that can read can read your posts and mine and see who is posting BS opinions and who is posting facts....so basically what you are saying, mr. oh I am so experienced, is you would prefer to listen to and believe what a guy is being paid to tell you and which can not be verified, while thinking legal sec filings are guess work and opinions? LOL...Who was this amateur you were talking about again? Oh, you must have been confused and been looking in the mirror when you made that post...

You sir are very naive......How about doing the board a favor since you BOLDLY state UNREGISTERED and RESTRICTED are IDENTICAL...and post both definitions here....c'mon hot shot, prove me wrong and post 2 simple definitions available with a mouse click and prove yourself right and me wrong....why is it everytime I ask you to do this, which you KNOW you would do if you could...you have NEVER taken me up? Why is that? You know very well if you could find FACTS to post proving you are right and I am wrong, you WOULD post them..yet you dont.....Ok, last chance and if you dont take me up, maybe I'll show you both definitions, show you they are not the same, and throw it in your face and ask if the SEC is wrong with their definitions, while some nut on a phone getting paid to talk you is correct and not the SEC......