Trade 4, "cost-effeciently" is your quote. We do not know at this time if the process is cost effective, all we know is that it produces H. We do not know how much it produces or the % of H produced.
One other point is that the PR was written by the company and not he PR firm. The wording was not great and the information was very general. I am still long on the stock and would have liked to have seen it get to .40 where I would have traded out of a few shares. For the mean time I will stay long and wait for more detailed information.
They did mention this "The alternative energy source that can be converted, on-site, to electricity, thus contributing immediately to the manufacturing facilities bottom line." How, is the next question. By fuel cell or internal combustion engine running generator or? Sketchy, non specific PR's always add to sell on news IMO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
