News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BobSinCA

02/02/15 11:15 PM

#33019 RE: payperview #33018

Requirements for uplisting to OTCQB are pretty benign, as I read the 'fact sheet' seen via click through here:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/marketplaces/otcqb

Seems like just have to be sec reporting (which they now are, I believe), have price over .01/share, pay fees ($2.5K application fee plus $10K/year), and post a certification of various items on the otcmarkets.com website.

Looking at the otcmarkets.com website, we see they are current with SEC reporting, but two most recent quarterly reports are not shown, and I could not find the requisite certification (perhaps someone else can).

Hard to understand why they would announce planned upgrade to OTCQB and then not do the things required. I know, they have previously announced plans to upgrade to a 'senior exchange,' but in those cases it was clear to a knowledgeable investor that they did not meet the requirements. In this case, seems they should be able to meet them.

Wonder how those who bought the big run up the day of/following the announced plan to upgrade to OTCQB, feel about the lack of follow through.
icon url

asus

02/10/15 11:16 AM

#33297 RE: payperview #33018

Please explain to me what "period" means in the context you provided. Does it mean that is final and you are an authority?

"BCCI does not qualify for an uplist. Period." --payperview

icon url

ReelTimer

02/10/15 12:56 PM

#33311 RE: payperview #33018

It only took one week for you to be proven completely wrong on the uplist.

BCCI does not qualify for an uplist. Period. Some investors don't want to accept this. Management knows this. A simple read of the requirements will easily show this.