News Focus
News Focus
icon url

WorstLuck

02/02/15 2:55 PM

#186921 RE: Rocky3 #186919

ENTA

Rocky, thanks for your continued commentary. For me, the "easy money" is over in the trade. Others may be more comfortable in this phase but I am not.

I too have nibbled a bit today for trading purposes. Under 40 still looks attractive while 50+ was not.
icon url

DewDiligence

02/03/15 4:27 PM

#186963 RE: Rocky3 #186919

GILD’s 4Q14 HCV sales:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/gilead-sciences-announces-fourth-quarter-210500475.html

Harvoni $2.11B (95% US)
Sovaldi $1.73B (68% US)
===
Total HCV sales $3.84B (83% US)
icon url

caravon

02/12/15 5:58 PM

#187456 RE: Rocky3 #186919

IMHO, the problem with ENTA is its management.

From the last AM, I got an impression that ENTA's management was too happy with themselves and somewhat lazy. CEO has clearly stated that he did not expect any serious competition (besides Gild) in a future. Now, we know that he was wrong, very wrong. Neither Gild nor other HCV competitors are taking easy and moving with great vigor ahead. Consequently, the financial community got an impression that ENTA might lose its future markets to competition and just fade away.

It appears ENTA license its products to somebody else (Abbv and NVS) and takes its easy. After 19 years in business, ENTA did not bring any of its products the market or even to Ph III.

I am looking forward to hear what ENTA's leaders have to say this time around.

PS
Once again, who is planning to be at the AM this years or what questions people like to ask?
icon url

Rocky3

02/12/15 8:34 PM

#187466 RE: Rocky3 #186919

Re $GILD, $ABBV, $ENTA: From Wells today re the 46% discount. Way too early to know if this is right (and it goes against the normal usage of language), but if it is right, the market is ripe for a huge correction in valuation of all the HCV stocks.

**Recall GILD had recently reported that the gross/net (discount) for their HCV products is expected in 2015 to be 46% --
meaning that for Harvoni, given that Sovaldi is likely discounted less, discounting could be up to 50-55% depending on
each drug's relative contribution to revenues.
**Our understanding now, and something we do not believe may be fully appreciated, is that the 46% blended number
likely refers to a discount per patient, rather than per pill. In other words, patients taking Harvoni for 8 weeks would have
an intrinsic 33% ''discount'' for a course of therapy, so if up to half of GT-1 Harvoni patients ultimately qualify for 8 weeks
of therapy rather than 12, this would itself account for 17% of the 50% ''discount.''
**This would imply that the actual ''per-pill'' Harvoni discount might be closer to 35-40%, and that revenues per U.S.
patient starting on the drug might be incrementally higher.
**Establishing this concept of a discount per patient, rather than per pill, makes sense to us not only because it would
enable GILD to effectively leverage the greater value conferred by a shorter-duration regimen (that ABBV cannot offer),
but would also potentially set GILD up to retain strong per-patient economics even if the regimen is shortened by addition
of a third component such as their PI.
**BOTTOM LINE: Though HCV discounting remains substantial, if indeed the 46% discount already incorporates the
inherently lower cost of the 8-week Harvoni regimen, the actual per-pill discount might be incrementally less -- and
revenues per new patient start incrementally higher -- than anticipated, increasing the likelihood 2015 sales could
meet/beat consensus if prescriptions remain strong. We believe GILD shares overly discount HCV uncertainties.