News Focus
News Focus
icon url

cabel

01/27/15 9:44 AM

#89444 RE: taas #89443

Great response Leo!!!

Thanks for sharing!
icon url

thefamilyman

01/27/15 9:47 AM

#89445 RE: taas #89443

That's strong!

We have excellent and exceptional technology in our compounds. For us to not run multiple programs would be not the right strategy. The potential GI market is likely to be significantly greater for CTIX then anti-biotics and we feel very confident with our product. During these months much research has gone into this. We very much want to enter the GI market. - Leo

icon url

FarmaZutical

01/27/15 9:47 AM

#89446 RE: taas #89443

I have to admit that Leo is very thorough and respectful when answering shareholder emails. I respect that a lot.
icon url

JTORENCE

01/27/15 9:49 AM

#89447 RE: taas #89443

Agree they have the technology, but not the experience to get over the humps in a timely manner
Time for a partnership with an experienced pharma that can open the doors for CTIX ..imo
icon url

rtwbybike

01/27/15 9:49 AM

#89448 RE: taas #89443

Leo is more polite than I would have been. Whoever "Tom" is, he sounds like a rude a-hole.
icon url

Anthropoid

01/27/15 9:57 AM

#89451 RE: taas #89443

fill time valleys with value .
icon url

Amatuer17

01/27/15 9:58 AM

#89452 RE: taas #89443

Nice response - it shows his long term thinking

When you read the response - specially Prurisol - it shows the number of steps and hurdles that need to be addressed before the trial can start - which adds to the delay.

So working on multiple trials at the same time makes sense. However the lack of resources (people and money) may make these tasks much more difficult for Leo.

The Tom guy seems clearly rude and does not have professional courtsey while communicating.
icon url

Darwinian

01/27/15 10:09 AM

#89456 RE: taas #89443

Excellent and dignified reply. Way to disregard the hostility and defend with fact ands and information. FWIW, I liked what I saw here in Leo's reply.


icon url

Fletch

01/27/15 10:11 AM

#89457 RE: taas #89443

Not sure a GI drug will be bigger for us then the worlds next antibiotic of choice. Maybe board docs can answer this. Now if both are the same drug......
Fletch
icon url

TheMonolith

01/27/15 10:19 AM

#89460 RE: taas #89443

Interesting divide developing over CTIX the past several weeks. Some don't want to question anything, and think full trust should be given. Others are scratching their head over recent events and communications.

icon url

Astavakra

01/27/15 3:52 PM

#89490 RE: taas #89443

Thanks, taas. Leo's response should be required reading for everyone who thinks that things should be moving at their own fabricated timeline. Leo lays out the reality and shows the efficiency with which CTIX is moving around the gameboard.
And, yes, Tom comes across as a boor; Leo, a gentleman.
icon url

58nout

01/28/15 6:07 PM

#89604 RE: taas #89443

This should be required reading for all of our scholarly posters, transparent traders and prognosticators along with new investors.
On second thought, it should be stickeyed and notated as "real diligence"!

Hi Tom,
I would disagree. There are always time lags in trials especially between phases. Take Prurisol as an example. We completed the crossover study. We need to wait for the lab results. OK, we were successful. Now the data has to be compiled, a briefing book prepared, etc. You then have a successful meeting with the FDA whereby they allow the Phase 2. Okay, you now call your manufacturer and place a order 2to source and manufacture your drug under cGMP conditions. That takes time. Now the FDA has authorized 4 arms with dosing of 2 pills taken twice a day.
So we now need to blister pack per cGMP each arm under instructions and coding from the statistician as it is blinded.
Arm 1 -no active in either AM or PM
Arm 2- 1 active in AM- No active in PM
Arm 3- 1 active AM- 1 active PM
Arm 4- 2 active AM- 2 active PM
Active means Prurisol

This takes time.

After delivery of the drug to sites, there is a lag time as well. Unfortunately no one has figured out a shortcut to this. We must therefore follow the rules meticulously.

We have excellent and exceptional technology in our compounds. For us to not run multiple programs would be not the right strategy. The potential GI market is likely to be significantly greater for CTIX then anti-biotics and we feel very confident with our product. During these months much research has gone into this. We very much want to enter the GI market.

Best wishes,

Leo Ehrlich | CEO |

cellceutix