the daily mail quoting breitbart. no, i guess you could say that YOU might find it interesting. about one attention-seeking self-promoter who has no credible science in his "findings" only speculative derivations from actual data. If he is a noted MIT professor why doesn't he shut up and get to work and disprove man made climate change via credible, repeatable science? Because he is just looking for a paycheck with out doing the science, that's why.
From the article:
notice a trend? and he crows about the small amount of increase last year... he really needs a remedial class in regression analysis. And maybe you need to go to Marcus Bachmann's class to learn to pray away the trolling behavior.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
