READ BLUE because it appears a couple of folks are mistaken as to the meaning and direction of this discussion!!!
DEFINITION of " Positive Equity "
" When you purchase stock in a publicly traded corporation you are said to have equity in that company, or a piece of the company's overall value. As a result, the value of your stock will decrease or increase accordingly based on the success of the company's business ventures. You are considered to have positive equity when this increase in value causes the value of your stock to rise higher than your original purchase price. This nets you a profit and a return on your initial investment in the company. "
The portion of the balance sheet that represents the capital received from investors in exchange for stock (paid-in capital), donated capital and retained earnings. Stockholders' equity represents the equity stake currently held on the books by a firm's equity investors.
It is calculated either as a firm's total assets minus its total liabilities, or as share capital plus retained earnings minus treasury shares!
That being said, I am NOT nor was I ever referencing STOCKHOLDER EQUITY.....I am fully aware of the number and just HOW it is obtained. By the way, that NUMBER also supports the above statement doesn't it? The PPS of SEEK has TANKED in comparison to that increase since last quarter of about $500K of " shareholders equity " and is just the OPPOSITE of what should be happening to the PPS!
NOW do you understand BLUE??? TWO different horses and two totally SEPARATE ENTITIES being discussed. Positive Equity is being pumped via PR's & CC's that Scott tosses out and it is MISLEADING & INCORRECT!
Bottom line here is Scott loves to TWIST his PR's to entice share sales every chance he gets. It has happened OVER and OVER ever since I bought in when EYSM was running wild with rumors, visions of grandeur, etc.!!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
