Replies to post #2479 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Anthony M]

Patricia_1

? Better to let someone man the boards who have NO IDEA who the posters are so they are not biased, read posts and do not read into them that the poster is insinuating something, hidden agenda cause they think they may have one, non assuming and will not take sides as it appears that there are some favorite people around here that do get special treatment and bend the rules but get away with it, ever so cleverly.[i/]


If someone man's the Boards and knows nothing about the topic of discussion, how can he/she assess what should stay or be deleted?
Remember, if the thread is not properly run by the Chairperson, I FEEL, that no one will STAY TUNED!

If there is too much bias, positive or negative, well they shall stick together, and the opposite side has a right to open their discussion on another thread (eg: Does FISH KILL). If it is a PUBLIC COMPANY THREAD, then InvestorsHub will have to put into place measures that can insure somewhat of a balance. (Again, it will need work and not be easy.)




A. MarketFusion

[Was (Bob)]

How can it be possible to debate when posts that are even actual fact posts, and nice posts, are deleted or the message is removed? All in the name of PERSONAL ATTACK on poster.

Not just in the name of "personal attacks". Remember that "because I don't want anyone thinking there's anything negative that can be said about this public/private company/point-of-view" is a valid reason in personal threads. And I initially made the mistake of thinking "personal thread" meant innocuous little subjects like "How to cook fish", when in fact they can be "Here's what I think about this company".