Replies to post #51428 on Lehman Brothers Financial SA (LEHNQ)

[rlinterests]

Obviously if Lehman owned some real estate they are probably receiving some lease payments. Once the expenses are subtracted for operating that property, that could result is a profit being declared.

Maybe I wrong, but, shouldn't the expense of Harvey Miller be included in your example?

And what about the expense of A&M? Shouldn't that be included?

I don't disagree with what you've stated here.

Keep in mind too that they no longer have any debt to service. Also any property that is sold they may have a capital gain.

They should be making a profit. So, why aren't we seeing it?

And if they are making profits, then why do they have to continue to hide behind the protection of the BK court?