Mlsoft.... You seem more concerned with "protecting" Mr Bush than with truth. Obviously, the current "scandal in the works" is a very, very serious matter. And if Bush, his Admin, or agencies under his watch intentionally misrepresented facts to make a case for war he could be the subject of impeachment proceedings, and rightfully so...
============================================================
Again, on the issue of Pres responsibility:
..Presidential statements, particularly on matters of national security, are held to an expectation of the highest standard of truthfulness. A president cannot stretch, twist or distort facts and get away with it..."
=============================================================
"not even the vast majority of democrats believe such a charge, levied almost entirely by the far left and anti-American factions."
"Far left and anti-American factions"?? Are you unaware of the current political angst of Mr Blair. The majority of the UK public is suspect of the case presented for war, as are many in their Parliament.
=============================================================
Go get credible proof of your allegations and come back to me then.
No need to get snippy, mlsoft, and I don't have to "prove" anything to you. I have a feeling the Brits will provide all the proof needed. Unfortunately for Mr Bush, the US media and/or the anti-American blather can not protect him from what may or may not come out of the UK - Blair investigation...
As always, we shall see!!... Agree? :)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
