Well you seem to have answered your own questions with the research you published.
The presentation reports on research into the effectiveness of silver nanoparticles in rendering hemorrhagic fever viruses like Ebola ineffective. The study was carried out using cell cultures, and a number of viruses and virus-like particles. It seemed to indicate that when the silver nanoparticles penetrated into cells along with the virus in sufficient quantities, they were effective at preventing the virus from being active once the cell had been exposed.
No one ever said there was research showing that silver nano particles were used on human Ebola patients. What was said was silver nano particles rendered Ebola virus inactive. Thank you for confirming that FACT. The most recent letter sent TO Dr. Laibow from the Sierra Leone Minister of Information seemed to confirm that PATIENTS WERE GETTING WELL USING SILVER NANO PARTICLES. Are you implying that it is unethical to treat dying patients, who have no hope of life with existing pharmaceutical approaches, be denied this potential LIFE SAVING treatment? Dr. Laibow said the protocol is 1 teaspoon every other hour for three days if you are sick with Ebola (published on her site). You could quadruple this and it would not harm a FLEA. Silver tetroxide is WATER SOLUABLE. It leaves the body in less than 4 days and most within a few hours. It is NON TOXIC to multi cellular organisms yet completely toxic to single celled organisms. THERE IS NO HARM IN THIS APPROACH. Just because it is a NON PHARMACUTICAL APPROACH does not make it wrong. Humans have EVERY RIGHT to cure themselves whenever possible. I just don't understand your thinking on this matter unless you are trying to protect the profits of the Pharma industry.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
