Honestly, being a new company and penetrating an existing highly competitive market. I don't think the shareholders are on the top of their list. That sounds like an awful statement, but it could be true. All too many times we see OTC companies pushing out PR's left and right to keep their shareholders up to date, but neglect to grow their primary source of income. $MINE is doing just that. I think they are putting a lot of time, resources and effort into production, marketing, and market saturation that they...I don't want to say forgotten, but I have degraded shareholders/Share price on their priority list.
Can you blame them? If you had a choice between happy investor or a lean green money making machine...what would you choose? Being traded and stocks are not $MINE's primary source of income. The products are (obviously).
You cannot argue with the fact that they are not giving us information on the operations. They've kept us in the loop with production runs and they have told us how well it is selling. The real #'s will come out officially when the filings are due. I'd rather have 100% rock solid #'s, than a "unofficial" or some fluff PR that has a lot of "should be" "could be" type language.
$MINE putting their product at the top of their priority list is GOOD thing. What did Vanis say about the buy back? When revenues permit. How the hell can you have a buy back with out a solid product generating those revenues? Let the team work, let them establish dominance in this market and let them do their job. I want transparency too, but think of it this way. We all sound like the nagging children asking mom and dad "why did you do that?' "Why is this going on" WHY WHY WHY.
They'll give us the information we need...let the team work.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
