Replies to post #31472 on Tersis Technologies Inc (TERS)

[trademax42]

This is awesome, look below a quote from stervc posts 31472.

Quote "This actually creates a potential of 300 acres to ”potentially” be used for marijuana cultivation for INCC."


INCC could firing from all cylinders: initially leasing one facility which brings $12 million revenues, providing the needed liquidity to do bigger and better things, then get into potentially more lucrative MJ cultivation operation.

Disclaimer: My posts are my personal opinion only, do your own DD before buying or selling securities.

[WeedMaster]

Sterling -Mehos is a possible INCC customer as stated in pr. Mehos is putting an application in by October first. LOL why is this even in PR? He is not INCC. Again INCC is NOT growing or selling pot!!! The only reason possible "renter" Mehos is mentioned is a scheme to sell shares. INCC is possibly building a building to possibly rent to Mehos who possibly might get a growers license. This is exactly what the pr says. Tomorrow will be a race to see who can get out first.

[SRV1975]

VR....Question for you concerning your thoughts on the expansion and amending of the original Chaffee county license for Prosperous Valley...

Also, within the article above/below, it was stated that owners of existing facilities would be able to expand their business by simply amending their original application:
http://www.themountainmail.com/free_content/article_1cdb117c-2880-11e4-b297-001a4bcf6878.html

I mentioned this part for two reasons...

First: Because it was noted that Mehos has a potential 251 acres that could be applicable to the marijuana cultivation operations here in INCC. The actual amount for INCC is unknown although 251 acres reflects a huge ”potential” for growth.

Second: I am fully aware that the 251 acres could be used for marijuana cultivation or it could be land separate from the 251 acres to be used for marijuana cultivation as it was confirmed that Mehos has another plot of land that is properly zoned under contract that is actually not 251 aces, but is less than 100 acres. This is what have gotten their foot into the door because now as what was stated within the article above… owners of existing facilities would be able to expand their business by simply amending their original application. This actually creates a potential of 300 acres to ”potentially” be used for marijuana cultivation for INCC.

v/r
Sterling

My question is In the Chaffee County Resolution 2014-35, section 7 refers the the amendments that you speak of that are excepted in the moratorium to the original license which includes: expansion and also mentions Transfers to new owners. See below...




Would it be safe to say, taking into consideration John G Mehos's age(80+ years old), that GroPro plans on buying Prosperous Valley once the license is issued and transferring that license to GroPro since it is allow within the moratorium along with the expansion of the operation. What are your thoughts on this? Would this be of value to INCC and GroPro or are they better off with prosperous valley as a client as far as revenue is concerned. Just noodling here....

Thanks in advance,

SRV