you call that responding to the erroneous assumption that number of fires is more indicative of fire impact than the size of the fires? you are off on a bizarre tangent having virtually zero to do with responding to my factual explanation with your Koch funded horseshit and deflections. that chinese site pawned off as a U.S. government site really goes a long ways to establishing any credibility you may have had once upon a time. and no, i am not going to waste my time debunking your breitbart and Koch lunacy. you should be able to do that yourself by reading credible sources.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
