News Focus
News Focus
icon url

chipdesigner

04/12/06 7:58 PM

#3980 RE: smooth2o #3979

No, it was Fab36, but on its currently shipping 90nm, not future 65nm.

icon url

muzohub

04/12/06 7:59 PM

#3981 RE: smooth2o #3979

don't be silly. fab 30 has been in operation for a long time. what was corrected on si was that the yield comment was about fab 36 not 65nm (ie fab 36 yielding 90nm well).
icon url

Vattila

04/12/06 8:00 PM

#3982 RE: smooth2o #3979

Re: That was corrected on the SI board

As others have pointed out, the comment was about mature 90nm output from Fab36 (mentioned in a question to Bob Rivet about inventory evaluation around 01:09:30 --- "mature yields takes guess-work out of the equation"). Elsewhere in the call 65nm output confirmed still planned for 2H06, as well as the use of capacity from Chartered.