News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Sentinel

04/10/06 3:11 PM

#147329 RE: big_money_insiders #147324

There were no "real numbers" in your post...only "scenarios" and assumptions. They may be right, but they are not "real" at this time.
icon url

xanadu

04/10/06 3:14 PM

#147333 RE: big_money_insiders #147324

Current O/S 3.8 billion and steady. IMO subs now 10,000+ and growing, and end of year estimate at least 100,000 even if each CC store only gets 4 sales per week of our packets.
icon url

oneinamillion

04/10/06 3:14 PM

#147335 RE: big_money_insiders #147324

BMI you have been bashing since 2 cents rally on CC news what makes you think the 50% drop does not factor in your fears that you are spreading and we coud rise on the 10Q when many folks that think 25 billion in OS see a much lower number. Your argument can be seen in two different ways.
icon url

rebtevyah

04/10/06 3:15 PM

#147338 RE: big_money_insiders #147324

bmi-you are reminding us of this why?
icon url

Sentinel

04/10/06 3:16 PM

#147342 RE: big_money_insiders #147324

icon url

kermit4karate

04/10/06 3:26 PM

#147360 RE: big_money_insiders #147324

Reality check BMI: I defend your right to your opinions, but how can you say that just because you throw out statistics that your conclusions are "the truth"?

Even your statistics are still opinions. Just take a look at your own post here. "Saw an earlier post that explained GZFX value is only .01 at 100,000 subscribers." OK, that's nice but it's just someone's opinion on valuation.

"...best case scenario of 8,500 currents subs" = the company's estimates, yes, but they don't preclude the company from having a breakout quarter, right?

"You have not seen even close to a bottom until after the Quarterly is filed." That, sir, is your opinion. It isn't based on fact, nor is it based on statistical analysis.

I mean, I agree with you a lot of the time, but tone down the rhetoric. You aren't the paramount of objectivity and reason that you so often claim to be. You're an articulate guy with pretty good sense and a lot of bold opinions. Enough already with the "I speaketh the truth. If thou doth not believeth me, then thou art the fool!"

-----
Posted by: big_money_insiders
In reply to: None Date:4/10/2006 3:09:46 PM
Post #of 147233

Quickly checking in. Not pretty at all.

Saw an earlier post that explained GZFX value is only .01 at 100,000 subscribers. And this is 4 times the number of subs many predict for the entire year.

Plus GZFX is in the red several months for the cash outlay per subscriber to CC.

Ask yourselves the true valuation of GZFX at current sub levels.

At BEST CASE scenario of 8,500 current subs and more than 4 billion Outstanding Shares (and rising).

People need to quit pumping and run the numbers on this.

Not pretty. The Q will show you much more of what I am getting at.

It is not automatically worth over pre CC announcement levels. There has been more Dilution since then.

You must factor in billions more shares when computing from pre CC levels.

The name CC can only do so much. It is already factored in at this time. AAFES is also known and factored in.

All imho. Tired of reading all of the pumps by Agent and Unknown_factor saying this is the bottom. People have been claiming bottom since 2 cents !

People pumping each day (as price falls) are the worst kind for the board.

You have not seen even close to a bottom until after the Quarterly is filed. You know what type of immediate frenzy of selling happened the last time they filed earnings...

Never bash me for using real numbers and being truthful.

No way I would hold this thing into the Q. And what can possibly make it go up before that hits the wire ?