Re: RANTS BOARD
Come over to my Q&A, let's discuss there. They are trying hard here to get the board back on track.
C'mon Matt, let's call a spade a spade! What they are trying to do is to find a reason to force you to ban people from that board the same way they forced you to ban people from the NOLIB board.
Ergo had a valid question last night that no one answered!!!
This was listed under the Rules of the Board not under a philosophy as you called it.
Bringing in a group to defend you will result in a request for permanent removal from the board.
So does this mean that if sarals posts something and gets blasted for it and I happen to come along and agree with sarals, or if Soxy happens to come along and agree with sarals then we are considered a "group"???? Exactly how much time shall we allow between posts so that it does not constitute a "group attack"
I think it's time that you take a long look at the lopsided ways that you handle things on these boards Matt.
Last night it took every ounce of willpower for me not to post in Ergo's defense because I totally agreed with everything he said. He asked a question and was never given an appropriate answer. Hell, he was never given an answer period! If I had posted my "opinion", it would have been considered a "group" attack and Ergo might have been banned.
You have let the moderator of that board have absolutely too much control. RANTS is becoming NOLIB all over again IMO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
