News Focus
News Focus
icon url

otraque

04/06/06 3:07 PM

#7075 RE: Amaunet #7073

No joking here, dead serious. What we are developing here is the LAST WAR in the modern age,period.

i drag out Einsein's great quote one more time, because it is Dead Center, bullseye, right on, in your face REALITY.

Einstein said "I do not know what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but i GUARANTEE the next war after will be fought with sticks and stones"

One must keep MUST constantly factoring in all factors not called war that are moving rapidly to a tipping point of plunging into an abyss, such as the economic/financial world, plus many energy and ecological elements, and population matters, just to name some

i , myself, will guarantee if these scenarios only come to pass in 1/2 part, humankind will have accomplished i feel what many hold down deep inside, but buried in denial; that being the human race is on a one way track to its own hell.

Futurists like Kurzweill are but manic optimist that are drunk on notions of Utopia, and absolutely blind to reality.
i pity the young, as they, if they live long enough will inherit hell unleashed.

What will be the underlying primary cause? The presence in this world of power groups playing dangerous games that are driven by greed, domination ambitions, utilizing strategems that all be fundamentally cruel self interest at the expense of the many.
This is a sick planet ruled by sick people.

The idealist have lost, the good guys are tied down, the psychopaths rise, the the huge circus tent is going to burn down, the carnival will be over.

Jared Diamond in his bestselling book on the death of civiliztions never see it coming.

Those reading Jared Diamond can match what he is writing and see it matches with the NOW, but on a scale never ever seen before in the history of humankind.

But his message will be heard by some but will have no effect on the drivers leading us into the deep pit.


Even when the SEERS can see we are but a few footsteps away from an ABYSS, the rulers will walk blind, taking all down with them as they reach a step point that has no ground beneath ; just a long fall into the darkness.

One can even approach this with the emotion free elegance of mathematics, and get no better prediction, in fact, it fortifies th dark view.

The odds for there being a happy ending is , to be optimistic, greater than 1,000,000 to one.

The outlandish smarmy opitimist, Thorton Wilder wrote a play "By the skin of our teeth", that is, we always prevail "by the skin of our teeth".

Well one he, Thornton Wilder, was a pathetic historian, because cilvilizations have had crushing catastrophic ends quite oft in the history of humankind; but now that we are GLOBALIZED, and the tendrils of destruction engulf the whole planet; it will be like no other collapse ever before in the tragic history of the human race.
My motto remains, i will live at peace within, with no fear of death, and hope to die as my mother did, with a sweet smile upon her face as she passed over one night in her sleep.

It was just a month after 9/11, and she had said, i don't want live in world where Bush is a hero, i don't like what i see in the future, i am ready to die, i just worry for the living.

The grandest thing is i had seen her over the last year of her life lose all fear of death, that is when the real peace came upon her, and her words became wiser and wiser as her last months here expired-- and yes her great sense of humour was kicking and alive right to the end.
So what is the point?

In the end my one single message is, all individuals that find their own inner peace and have murdered fear; you will be free.
max








icon url

Amaunet

04/07/06 11:06 AM

#7097 RE: Amaunet #7073

Searching for attackers lurking in the night




This is important: Germane to all this, Moscow perceives a likely replay of past Anglo-American attempts to pit the Muslim world against Russia. Given its history, geography and culture and the multinational and multi-faith character of its society, Russia has everything to lose in an "inter-civilizational" conflict.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently wrote:
Russia will not let anybody set it at loggerheads with the Islamic world ...


What this probably means is that as Moscow prepares for the great war in Northern Caucasus the Us and Israel in their hypocritical rat like manner will be there to fan the flames of death and destruction in another attempt to break Russia apart.
Pls see:
Moscow is getting ready for the great war in Northern Caucasus #msg-10554411


-Am

By M K Bhadrakumar


Apr 8, 2006
There is enormous political symbolism in the circuitous route that US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice took for visiting Baghdad on Monday. She headed first to the quiet British town of Blackburn for a weekend's bonding with her British allies, and then proceeded to Iraq, accompanied by British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw.

Any limited perspective on the Rice-Straw mission in terms of cajoling Ibrahim al-Jaafari to give up his prime ministership in Baghdad overlooks that Iraq is the cornerstone of the United States' imperial venture in remaking the Middle East, with the objective of controlling the region - its flows of oil, weapons and money.

Two major powers traditionally active in the region are responding to the Anglo-American drive for a New Middle East - Russia and Turkey.

The Russian moves are impressive - strengthening ties with Saudi Arabia, gaining observer status in the Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC), revival of ties with Syria and Egypt, contact with Hamas, networking with Iraqi Sunni tribal leaderships, institutional ties with the Arab League, and, arguably, the heavily nuanced line on Iran.

Germane to all this, Moscow perceives a likely replay of past Anglo-American attempts to pit the Muslim world against Russia. Given its history, geography and culture and the multinational and multi-faith character of its society, Russia has everything to lose in an "inter-civilizational" conflict.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently wrote:
Russia will not let anybody set it at loggerheads with the Islamic world ... The increased significance of the energy factor in global politics is on the mind of many. Even those who have got used to thinking in terms of geopolitics appreciate that the equation formula of strategic stability has changed and the specific weight of nuclear deterrence itself has diminished ... At the same time, it is obvious that any sustained development of Russia's energy sector rules out for the foreseeable future any disregard of the Near and Middle East resources in a global energy balance.
In a lengthy message addressed to the Arab League summit meeting at Khartoum on March 28, Russian President Vladimir Putin said:
I am well aware that the heads of state and peoples of the Arab world, and in other Muslim states, share Russia's growing concern about the danger arising out of new divisions in the international community. It is our deep conviction that the time has come to act, and to act together, under the auspices of the United Nations as a key player.

As the events of the last few years in the Middle East have shown, unilateral actions do not resolve problems and they even aggravate them. Russia, a multi-confessional country with observer status within the Organization of Islamic Conference, has firm intentions to make a significant contribution to this teamwork.

Putin called for "consensual approaches" to the issues of social, economic and political transformation in the Arab world: "Events should not be rushed in an artificial way, nor should outside pressure be applied." Stressing that resolving the Palestinian problem within the framework of UN Resolutions 242, 338, 1397 and 1515 should be the priority, Putin described Russia's "dialogue" with Hamas as an "approach to new realities in a constructive and pragmatic way".

Putin said Iraq's unity and territorial integrity could only be achieved through a national dialogue and by "ending the foreign military presence". He called for a lowering of "tensions around Lebanon and Syria" and opposed "any third-party" role.

It comes as no surprise that the countries of the Arab Middle East have warmed to the Russian overtures.

Moscow hosted on March 27-28 the first session of the so-called Russia-Islamic World Strategic Vision Group comprising Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, Egypt, etc. Putin greeted the foreign delegates attending the conference. Significantly, Yevgeni Primakov, former prime minister and renowned orientalist who played a key role in crafting the Soviet Union's ties with the Arab world through the Cold War years, chaired the Moscow meet.

Again, the head of the Saudi National Security Council, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, paid a "working visit" to Moscow on Tuesday. The Russian Foreign Ministry said the hugely influential Saudi prince's agenda included the Palestine issue, Syria, Lebanon, Iran and "conditions in Iraq", apart from "building up and deepening" Russia-Saudi relations.

Turkey, too, is seeking to revive its ties in the Middle East - a region that it turned its back on in 1923. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's presence at the Arab League summit in Khartoum as a "permanent guest" meshes with a series of Turkish moves in the past three years.

Turkey claims it is trying to act as a "bridge" between the Middle East region and the Western world. (Curiously, Russia also is staking claims for a similar role as a "civilizational bridge" between the Muslim world and the West.)

But the US may not accede to such a profound role for Turkey or Russia - and Ankara and Moscow cannot be unaware of that. The US simply ignored similar Turkish (and Russian) claims in the 1990s to act as a "bridge" in the Balkans during the crises in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo.

Turkish-US relations (like Russian-US relations) have been increasingly bumpy. Yet Turkey couldn't sit on the fence. It has vital interests to safeguard - least of all in its eastern provinces.

Turkey also has a government with a ruling party of pronounced religious orientation, which is approaching an election and would have to grapple with a resurgence of nationalism that has overtones of political Islam, and is heavily laden with "anti-Americanism". And this at a juncture when the so-called Kemalist secular camp has atrophied (or fragmented) almost to the point of irrelevance in the country's party politics, and a drift in Turkey's search for European Union membership is visible.

More important, as in Moscow, few in Ankara are convinced that Washington is anywhere near being transparent in its Iraq policies. Both Russia and Turkey would suspect that Washington did not have an "exit strategy" in Iraq because no exit was (or is) intended. They fear that if push comes to shove, the US will not hesitate to turn Iraq, in fragments, into a de facto colony.

Few in Ankara today, therefore, share Washington's hostility toward Syria and Iran. Ankara, like Moscow, favors engagement of Syria and Iran and opposes the use of force or "regime changes" in these neighboring countries.

Equally so, Turkey is deeply skeptical (like Russia) about the United States' "transformational diplomacy" in the Middle East. "Democratization is a process, and it should be expected to proceed at a different pace in different countries," Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said in a written statement last month.

Ankara also hosted Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal. A Turkish Foreign Ministry statement said, "At this stage, the international community should adopt a prejudice-free attitude and give the new Palestinian government the opportunity to fulfill its obligations."

Israel and the pro-Israeli lobby in the US went ballistic over the Hamas chief's visit to Turkey. But the Turkish leadership (like the Kremlin) held firm. Erdogan insisted Turkey was doing the "right thing at the right time".

Again, Jaafari visited Ankara when the US was working hard to get him to quit office. (Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said the visit took place without his knowledge, and he wouldn't "recognize" any agreements that the Iraqi prime minister entered into with the Turkish government.)

A visit by influential Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr to Turkey is now talked about. Turkey is reaching out to different Iraqi constituencies - just in case.

Turkey's Sabah newspaper recently quoted a "high-level" US official voicing fears in Washington about "Turkey's metamorphosis into a new Malaysia". Indeed, Turkey sought and obtained the post of secretary general of the OIC. (Turkey was supportive of Russia's observer status in the body.)

Erdogan's presence at the Arab League summit in Khartoum last week signified the culmination of an initiative made during his visit to Cairo in January 2003. The Arab League initially had reservations on account of Turkey's close ties with Israel, but circumstances have changed dramatically since the Iraq war began. (Interestingly, on his return journey to Ankara from Khartoum, Erdogan made a detour to visit the OIC headquarters in Jeddah.)

Looking after interests
But Turkey does not cross swords with the US or Britain in the Middle East. Like Russia, Turkey is primarily taking precautions that at the very least a New Middle East, if one indeed shapes up under Anglo-American supervision, would not be pitted against Turkey's core interests. In uncertain times, it becomes prudent to hedge one's bets.

Having said that, both Moscow and Ankara will focus on Iraq in immediate terms. This course is Iraq's security. Moscow and Ankara would be justified to ask: "What was it that Straw could offer Rice?"

The answer lies in one of the most influential and enduring British strategic theories attributed to T E Lawrence. This strategy was distilled by Lawrence in the deserts of Arabia in the second decade of the 20th century (and to which Britain remained largely faithful even in Northern Ireland). In terms of this, Straw would tell Rice that in Iraq, to begin with, instead of being bogged down in a senseless trench war where armed clashes were turning into mass butchery, Washington should focus on a strategy of warfare that dispensed with battles.

Conceivably, Straw would counsel Rice that instead of attacking the Iraqi enemies, she should go around them, as Lawrence would have done, "immobilizing and isolating them, wearing them down as their sentries peer into the darkness searching for attackers who might or might not be lurking in the night" - to use the inimitable words of David Fromkin, author of the classic study on 1922 Middle East settlement, A Peace to End All Peace.

A problem remains, however. As Fromkin would point out, Lawrence's strategy has its limitations. It has no use for a country fighting for survival; a country that obstinately refuses to surrender and may need to be crushed by force; and an enemy that will not surrender even if tired, but chooses to fight to hold on to something it can't afford to give up.

Thus a paradox so typical of our times arises: the strategy attributed to Lawrence, the hero of British imperialism, is most effective against a great power that favors pitched, face-to face battles.

But Straw could as well have told that to Rice while strolling in the town center in Blackburn. A symbolic visit to Baghdad should not have been necessary.

M K Bhadrakumar served as a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service for more than 29 years, with postings including ambassador to Uzbekistan (1995-98) and to Turkey (1998-2001).

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HD08Ak03.html












icon url

Amaunet

04/18/06 8:33 PM

#7347 RE: Amaunet #7073

US urges new terrorist attacks against Russia

Russia says seminar in U.S. "urged new terrorist attacks"

Background:
The United States may be attempting to keep Russia from coming to the aid of Iran by using the Chechens as a diversion in the Northern Caucasus. This is a well documented tactic utilized by Bush.

Moscow is getting ready for the great war in Northern Caucasus
#msg-10554411

The United States has previously used the Chechens to initiate terrorists attacks against Russian. The most notable was Bush’s slaughter of the Russian school children at Beslan.
#msg-3953878

RUSSIANS: "SCHOOL SEIZURE WAS PLANNED IN WASHINGTON AND LONDON." #msg-4307815

The Beslan tragedy is to be regarded as a link in a chain of terror acts to strike the entire Caucasus and undermine Russia, he pointed out.
#msg-4589620

Basayev confirmed he was behind Beslan tragedy in interview
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20050906/41310815.html

Basayev is currently working with Maskadov who is currently working with Akhmadov who has been granted asylum by the United States.
#msg-4307815

The International Forecaster editor Bob Chapman writes: The group that massacred 170 children and 130 adults in Beslan led by CIA operative Shamil Basayev, took their orders from abroad ... there is no question this is an extension of Anglo-American foreign policy to dismember Russia as we predicted 12 years ago.
#msg-4194861

-Am

Russia says seminar in U.S. "urged new terrorist attacks"
19:13 | 18/ 04/ 2006




MOSCOW, April 18 (RIA Novosti) - The Foreign Ministry summoned the U.S. ambassador in Moscow Tuesday to hand him a note of protest against a seminar in Washington which it said called for new terrorist attacks in Russia.

"The organization of such events in the United States contradicts the country's international obligations in the sphere of counter-terrorism," the ministry said.

A seminar entitled, Sadullaev's Caucasian Front: Prospects for the Next Nalchik, took place in Washington on April 14 under the aegis of Jamestown Foundation, an American non-governmental organization. The Russian Foreign Ministry said the floor had been given to speakers who called for new terrorist acts in Russia.

"Such concessions on the part of Washington to Chechen militants and separatists also run counter to the spirit of partner-based bilateral anti-terrorist cooperation, and damage bilateral relations," the Russian ministry said.

In October 2005, at least 150 militants attacked administrative buildings in the city of Nalchik, the capital of the North Caucasus republic of Kabardino-Balkaria. Russian officials say that during two days of fighting, 35 law-enforcement officers and 12 civilians were killed. A total of 92 militants were killed and dozens captured.




http://en.rian.ru/world/20060418/46572875.html





icon url

Amaunet

04/25/06 11:26 AM

#7553 RE: Amaunet #7073

Russia stages anti-terror drills in south


Background:
There are indications the United States is promoting this war between Russia and the Chechens. This is a well documented past behavior of the US.
#msg-10791089

In addition on April 18, the Foreign Ministry summoned the U.S. ambassador in Moscow Tuesday to hand him a note of protest against a seminar in Washington which it said called for new terrorist attacks in Russia.
#msg-10724046

This is interesting that China, which faces a Muslim separatist movement in its western Xinjiang region also being promoted by the United States, sent a delegation to observe the exercises. China has already protested the establishment of a Uighur Government-in-Exile in Washington and Beijing has repeatedly made it clear that it will not tolerate any political interference from abroad, where pro-independence Uighur organizations exist. This means us. It would seem we are orchestrating a riot in the Uigher/Xinjiang province of China.
#msg-4098311

Moreover Chinese troops will take part in a military exercise with Russia in the same area next spring.

With Peace Mission 2005 behind them, Russia and China are planning for new military exercises, this time to take place in southern Russia. Russian Interior Minister Rashid Nurgaliyev stated on March 2 that Russia and China have "made plans to conduct exercises in spring 2007 in [Russia's] Southern Federal District". According to Nurgaliyev, the joint exercises will include special forces from China's Public Security Ministry, in addition to special forces and regular troops from Russia's Interior Ministry. The exercises, described by Nurgaliyev as large-scale, will "develop skills for cooperation in accomplishing objectives to counter the threat of terrorism". #msg-10248118
#msg-10554411

-Am

Russia stages anti-terror drills in south

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Monday, April 24, 2006 · Last updated 10:42 a.m. PT

MOSCOW -- Russia on Monday launched one of the largest anti-terrorism drills in recent years in its troubled south, involving 32,000 personnel from the police, intelligence and military branches of the security forces, media reports said.

The exercises began in the Rostov region with a simulated terror attack by militants on a population center.

Television pictures showed helicopter gunships firing from above as masked rebels ran on the ground with a group of pretend hostages.

The NTV channel said that the drill aimed to test the ability of police, Federal Security Service and Defense Ministry units to coordinate their actions during special operations.

The TV report said that after Rostov, the exercises would move to Dagestan and Kabardino-Balkariya in the next few days. China, which faces a Muslim separatist movement in its western Xinjiang region, sent a delegation to observe the exercises, news agencies quoted the Russian Defense Ministry as saying.

Russia has battled with a separatist insurgency in Chechnya for more than a decade, and the violence increasingly has afflicted other regions in the impoverished and largely Muslim North Caucasus.






http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1103AP_Russia_Terrorism.html