News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stocks r us

04/05/06 6:05 PM

#843 RE: silverfox1155 #842

FOX

No problem. Just wanting to shed some light on this ridiculous stirring of unworthy news. Smart-Tek is a good small cap and building their Market Cap rather quickly!

Some mid-large caps that I like are COGO and CNQR. Do your research though....that's what will afford you to trade another day!

Here is COGO's website http://www.comtech.com.cn

STTK will prove to be worthy as well....

Check this out...they may get the contracts to build the security needs that come with hosting such as event...
http://www.smart-teksolutions.com/ind-mk.html

Just something to look for in the future...


icon url

petermic

04/05/06 6:15 PM

#846 RE: silverfox1155 #842

All this blab blab blab here, but no factual rebuttal to the Stocklemon accusations whatsoever. Stocklemon's accusations were documented by links to indpendent websites, including the Securities & Exchange Commission but you cheerleaders just go rah rah rah.

The point here is whether this Goodwin Wang person is deeply involved with STTK, and whether this is the same person who was sanctioned by the SEC for lying about doing business in China, and how relevant is that to today's STTK.

The point too is - is there any hard evidence that STTK is for real in this business....is there really a business or just a hell of a lot of PR's?

Certainly this is not proof that STTK is a scam, but all this belly-aching without any fact-based rebuttal just makes it seem as if this thread is populated by a bunch of paid pumpers who are not disclosing that they are paid, and pretending to be ordinary investors.

At least Stocklemon says who he is - does not pretend something else. If people on this board are being paid to pump, not disclosing, and know they are perpetrating lies......well, do their mothers know what they do for a living? I've never understood how those people can live with themselves. Even if they make a lot of money, can they be happy people knowing they lied and cheated to get it?