News Focus
News Focus
icon url

STOCKBULLY

08/01/14 9:26 AM

#19945 RE: YesWeCannabis #19942

Well, they aren't vague about everything. They are pretty specific about the 100's of millions of shares being converted and issued at .0001.

They are pretty vague about the who what and wheres of the opperations

Q2 June 30, 2013
Shares issued from debt conversions 121,000,000 $12,100
These shares were converted at .0001
page 5
www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=NWGC&id=109865

Q3 September 30, 2013
Shares issued from debt conversions 191,000,000 $19,100
These shares were converted at .0001
page 5
www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=NWGC&id=113217

Annual Report December 31, 2013
Shares issued from debt conversions 231,500,000 $23,150
These shares were converted at .0001
page 5
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=NWGC&id=117704

Q1 March 31, 2014
Shares issued from debt conversions 77,500,000 $7,750
These shares were converted at .0001
page 5
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=NWGC&id=120877
icon url

StraightShooter58

08/01/14 10:19 AM

#19959 RE: YesWeCannabis #19942

This is a misstatement of facts. The business consultant only assisted Mr. Talbert create the financial statements. There is no indication that the business consultant is a CPA and thus can not provide an attest opinion as to the material correctness of the financial filings. In fact, if he is assisting management develop the financial statements, he is not independent and thus can't provide an attest opinion.

Further, the Lawyer is only providing an opinion that the information provided meets the minimum standards required under Rule 144(c)(2). The minimum standard is that he look at the information that was provided to him and it looks like the documents could be correct and they are the type of documents you would normally see provided.