News Focus
News Focus
icon url

F6

07/19/14 4:28 AM

#225594 RE: F6 #225577

Christie: I Would Bring Traffic Over the Border to a Standstill


Photograph by Jessica Kourkounis/Getty.

Posted by Andy Borowitz
July 17, 2014

IOWA CITY (The Borowitz Report)— Testing the political waters in Iowa today, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie said that if he is elected President, he would bring the flow of illegal immigrants over the U.S.-Mexico border to a virtual standstill.

“There are ways of keeping people from getting to where they want to go,” Christie said, claiming that he was the only Republican hopeful with the hands-on experience necessary to fix the border crisis.

The New Jersey governor was vague about how he would halt traffic over the border, but exuded confidence that he was the right man for the job.

“I’d make a few phone calls,” he said. “It would get done.”

© 2014 Condé Nast

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2014/07/christie-i-would-bring-traffic-over-the-border-to-a-standstill.html

---

(linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104452496 and preceding and following

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104454921 (and any future following)
icon url

fuagf

07/22/14 10:46 PM

#225991 RE: F6 #225577

Illegals and gangsters and Ebola, oh my! 5 conservative immigration myths of the moment, made sane

As lawmakers seek a solution to the border crisis, the hysterics have reached a new level. We separate punditry from reality

[...]

Theory No1: Obama is 'secretly dispersing illegal immigrants around the country'

[...]

Theory No2: Undocumented migrants are bringing Ebola and measles to America .. one bit ..

Ebola has never been reported in Latin America. Repeat: never. Not even in cases of laboratory contamination, which have resulted in human infection in Russia and England, and animal infection in the US. All naturally-occurring cases of "human illness or death [due to Ebola] have occurred in Africa," according to the CDC .. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/exposure/index.html .

[...]

Theory No3: 'violence is likely not the primary cause of the surge of thousands of unaccompanied minors'

[...]

Theory No4: Citizens militias are more effective than the National Guard

[...]

Theory No5: Border residents don't want immigrants in their towns

much more .. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/15/immigration-myths-debunked-border-crisis

===

Amid the "crisis at our southern border," there are "reports of illegal migrants carrying deadly diseases such as … Ebola virus."

Phil Gingrey on Monday, July 7th, 2014 in a letter to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[...]


So is there anything to the Ebola claim?

Experts we asked issued a resounding "No."

First, we checked with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, whose job includes tracking outbreaks of serious infectious diseases. Spokesman Daniel J. DeNoon confirmed that the CDC has received no reports of a human Ebola infection anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, much less the U.S.-Mexico border. "Ebola cases in humans have never been reported outside of Africa," DeNoon said.

William Schaffner, an infectious-disease specialist at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, agreed. "The congressman is misinformed," he said. "There is no Ebola in the Western Hemisphere."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/jul/18/phil-gingrey/rep-phil-gingrey-says-migrants-may-be-bringing-ebo/

===

Debunking conspiracy theories regarding increased number of people seeking asylum because of gang violence

By Michele Garnett MacKenzie and Susan Banovetz, The Advocates for Human Rights .. http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/partners/advocates-human-rights

August 20, 2013

Seventy-two Latin American migrants crossing Mexico and headed to the U.S. border in 2010, met their fates together. Their families, frightened by the control wielded by brutal drug gangs in regions of Mexico, had begged their loved ones not to make the trek, but the migrants remained determined, yearning for a better existence.

They were massacred before realizing their goal. One hundred miles from the U.S. border, the migrants were found shot to death, lying in a row, bound and blindfolded.

Five cars had intercepted them on a highway. More than 10 gunmen jumped out of the vehicles and identified themselves as Zetas, a group started by former Mexican army special forces soldiers and now a lethal drug gang.

“They tied up the migrants and took them to the ranch, where they demanded the migrants work for the gang,” the Associated Press reported in 2010, recounting police statements. “When most refused, they were blindfolded, ordered to lie down and shot.”

Eighteen-year-old Luis Freddy Lala Pomavilla of Ecuador, the lone survivor, lived to tell of the terror.

This account and experiences of The Advocates for Human Rights’ asylum clients, fly in the face of the blame-the-victim suspicions and the conspiracy theory spun in an August 12 FOX News .. [invalid link] .. report that focused on the increased number of people from Mexico and Central America coming to the United States’ southern border to seek asylum, claiming credible fear of gangs and drug cartels.

“This clearly has [to be] orchestrated by somebody,” former U.S. Attorney for Southern California Peter Nunez was quoted as saying. “It’s beyond belief that dozens or hundreds or thousands of people would simultaneously decide that they should go to the U.S. and make this claim.”

Let’s take a closer look at the source of the “orchestration theory,” and delve into the reality confronting people living in large parts of Mexico and Central America.

Nunez chairs the Center for Immigration Studies, the think-tank arm of Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), an organization that, despite its facade of legitimacy, was determined by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a hate group. FAIR’s sole mission, according to the SPLC: to severely limit immigration into the United States.

“FAIR leaders have ties to white supremacist groups and eugenicists, and have made many racist statements,” according to the SPLC. “Its advertisements have been rejected because of racist content. Moreover, FAIR’s founder, John Tanton, has expressed his wish that America remain a majority-white population, a goal to be achieved, presumably, by limiting the number of nonwhites who enter the country.”

Brutal, Ruthless Gangs Rule

The largest, most violent, and most organized gangs operate in Mexico and Central America, with estimates of more than 70,000 gang members in Central America; other sources estimate as many as 200,000 members, according to Jillian Blake, author of “Gang and Cartel Violence: A Reason to Grant Political Asylum from Mexico and Central America,” published by The Yale Journal of International Law, 2012. Even with the lower estimate, there are more gang members than military troops.

In Mexico, the number of “foot soldiers” working for the two most violent drug cartels is about 100,000, almost equal to the number of Mexican military personnel, says Blake.

U.S. military officials report the conflict in Mexico and Central America rivals the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan regarding scale of violence, spending, and weapons.

Powerful gangs and cartels have de facto control over a significant amount of territory and directly influence state and government officials. “There are many young, vulnerable individuals struggling to overcome poverty in regions in which traditional state authority and police control have eroded,” said Deepinder Mayell, director of The Advocates’ Refugee and Immigrant Program. “With rampant corruption and the absence of the rule of law, powerful gangs can shape a country’s economy, culture, and the day-to-day life, such as in Mexico and Central America.”

The Mexican state of Michoacan is arguably at the epicenter: Most of the 600 people who have come to the border during the past month seeking asylum protection are from small villages being ravaged by cartels, according to reports.

People live in extraordinary danger, faced every day with violence at its most extreme. These are people resisting gang demands, resisting recruitment, and resisting extortion. They are women who are victims of sexual violence and intimidation. They are human rights advocates and church activists. They are law enforcement agents. They are people trying to leave the gangs they were forced to join.

Christian Chaidez, originally of Cuidad Juarez, Mexico, fled to this country in 2011. Ten of his relatives, small-business owners including his father and grandmother, were slaughtered for refusing to pay extortion to gangs, according to Borderland Beat, a website reporting on the Mexican cartel drug war.

Then there are the 55,000 people enslaved by Mexican cartels and forced to work at gunpoint for gangs, according to Esclavos del Narco (Narco Slaves), a report compiled by the Mexican news site, Animal Politico.

The report also tells of 36 young professionals ? mostly engineers ? who disappeared about five years ago. Abducted by cartels, the engineers were forced to build private cellphone networks across Mexico to ensure that cartel communications are safe from eavesdropping by police or rival groups.

The report describes how cartels force children to sell drugs on street corners; how immigrants on their way to the United States must make an anguishing choice: transport drugs across the border or be murdered in cold blood; how migrants are kidnapped and forced under threat to work as hitmen, to join gangs; how women are locked up, deceived, and forced to serve as sex slaves; how very young children are lured into arming themselves with automatic rifles in the name of some organization.

The case of a client of The Advocates illustrates the plight of people from Mexico trying to escape gang violence. The man was kidnapped by a cartel, held for ransom, and threatened with death. Out of fear for his life, he fled to the U.S. on two occasions. Each time, he was apprehended by ICE, tells Michele Garnett MacKenzie, director of advocacy for The Advocates.

“Despite the fact that he told of his fear of being returned to Mexico because of gang threats, U.S. immigration officials told him that he had no chance of winning since he was from Mexico and that, if he did make a claim, he would be in prison for at least a year,” she states. “Not only did they not conduct a screening as they were required to do, they clearly discouraged him from applying.”

The Advocates’ client recently made his case to remain in the U.S. based on his fear of continued persecution by cartels and the government. The case remains pending, and he remains in jail.

Asylum claims largely rejected by immigration authorities

Despite the increased violence from Mexico and Central America, U.S. immigration authorities have largely rejected asylum claims.

In 2012, Mexico for the first time ranked in the U.S. Department of Justice’s top 25 of asylum grants by country of nationality, at 17 behind countries like China, Pakistan and El Salvador. However, the cases approved were less than 1.6% of the total asylum grants issued before an immigration judge and less than 2% of asylum grants issued by an asylum officer ? contradicting the notion that Mexicans are “gaming” the asylum system.

“We routinely see people fleeing gangs who have experienced persecution commensurate with that experienced by other asylum seekers and motivated by the same things – power, greed, and the need for political and economic control over a region and its vulnerable populations,” said Michele Garnett McKenzie, director of advocacy for The Advocates for Human Rights. “If we changed the setting and the country, the cases would be granted. But, because of some refugees’ nationalities, they are denied protection.”

Michele Garnett MacKenzie is The Advocates’ director of advocacy, and Susan Banovetz is the organization’s director of communications.

The Advocates for Human Rights

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/blog/anonymous/debunking-conspiracy-theories-regarding-increased-number-people-seeking-asylum-becaus






icon url

fuagf

07/22/14 11:01 PM

#225993 RE: F6 #225577

8 Of the Most Vicious Myths About Illegal Immigrants

Kevin Maloney's avatar image By Kevin Maloney June 20, 2013

With an immigration reform bill making its way through Congress, it is time to debunk the myths associated with illegal immigration and shed light on the impact these negative comments have on immigrants themselves. Terms that are bandied about include "anchor babies," "criminals," "job stealers," and more. The full bill can be found at http://www.schumer.senate.gov/forms/immigration.pdf .

1. "Anchor Babies" keep their parents in the United States.

One of the common terms used against illegal immigrants is the term "anchor babies." In actuality there is no such thing. According to statistics, over 108,000 parents of U.S.-born children have been deported over the last decade. Being the parent of a U.S.-born child does not in any way guarantee any right of that parent to stay in the U.S., as the statistics prove. In addition, the child must turn 21 before they can sponsor a parent for legal entry into the U.S. using form I-130.

2. Anyone who illegally enters the U.S. is a criminal.

Only very serious misbehavior is generally considered “criminal” in our legal system. Violations of less serious laws are usually “civil” matters and are tried in civil courts. People accused of crimes are tried in criminal courts and can be imprisoned. Federal immigration law says that unlawful presence in the country is a civil offense and is, therefore, not a crime. The punishment is deportation. However, some states — like Arizona — are trying to criminalize an immigrant’s mere presence. As the laws are currently written, illegal entry into the United States does not make one a "criminal".

3. Illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes but still get benefits including free education for their children.

Undocumented immigrants pay taxes every time they buy gas, clothes, or new appliances. They also contribute to property taxes — a main source of school funding — when they buy or rent a house or apartment. In addition, the Social Security Administration estimates that half to three-quarters of undocumented immigrants pay federal, state, and local taxes, including $6 billion to $7 billion in Social Security taxes for benefits they will never get using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number issued to them by the IRS. They can receive schooling and emergency medical care, but not welfare or food stamps as they lack the documents needed for those benefits.

4. There are more illegal immigrants here now than ever before.

As a percentage of the U.S. population, the historic high actually came in 1900, when the foreign-born constituted nearly 20% of the population. Today, about 12% of the population is foreign-born. Since the start of the recession in 2008, the number of undocumented immigrants coming into the country has actually dropped.

5. Illegal immigrants bring crime.

Nationally, since 1994, the violent crime rate has declined 34% and the property crime rate has fallen 26%, even as the number of undocumented immigrants has doubled. According to the conservative Americas Majority Foundation, crime rates during the period 1999–2006 were lowest in states with the highest immigration growth rates. During that period the total crime rate fell 14% in the 19 top immigration states, compared to only 7% in the other 31. Truth is, foreign-born people in America — whether they are naturalized citizens, permanent residents, or undocumented — are incarcerated at a much lower rate than native-born Americans, according to the National Institute of Corrections.

6. Immigrants take good jobs from Americans.

According to the Immigration Policy Center, a nonpartisan group, research indicates there is little connection between immigrant labor and unemployment rates of native-born workers. Here in the United States, two trends — better education and an aging population — have resulted in a decrease in the number of Americans willing or available to take low-paying jobs. Between 2000 and 2005, the supply of low-skilled American-born workers slipped by 1.8 million.

7. Today’s immigrants don’t want to blend in and become “Americanized” and refuse to learn English.

In 2010, about 500,000 immigrants became naturalized citizens. They had to overcome obstacles like getting here, finding a job, overcoming language barriers, paying naturalization fees, dealing with a famously lethargic immigration bureaucracy, and taking a written citizenship test. This is not the behavior of people who take becoming American lightly.

8. There’s a way to enter the country legally for anyone who wants to get in line.

The simple answer is that there is no “line” for most very poor people with few skills to stand in and gain permanent U.S. residency. For about the first 100 years, the United States had an open immigration system that allowed any able-bodied immigrant in. The biggest obstacle would-be immigrants faced was getting here. Today there are many rules about who may enter the country and stay legally. Under current policy, many citizens’ immigrant ancestors who arrived between 1790 and 1924 would not be allowed in today.

http://mic.com/articles/43599/8-of-the-most-vicious-myths-about-illegal-immigrants
icon url

fuagf

02/17/15 3:05 AM

#231806 RE: F6 #225577

Judge blocks Obama policy that would shield millions from deportation


In announcing Monday's court decision, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott cheered the nation's "system of
checks and balances." Above, Abbott in January. (Joel Martinez / The Monitor)

By Molly Hennessy-Fiske and Christine Mai-Duc

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-texas-judge-injunction-immigration-20150216-story.html

See also:

GOP won the midterms. Did anyone tell Obama?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=108604628