The precise reasons you mention as a negative are the reasons I am here. Telvue, having a billionaire investor who asks nothing from a company except some preferred shares, is there to help. Telvue doesn't use a dime of my money to operate. As pointed out so many, many times by detractors the stock has no volume and is "illiquid" -- proving precisely that it does not depend on sales of shares to operate. The financials show how the company is making its money and it isn't off me. The arguments are self defeating. If the company were a shell or a scam as some claim then it would be all about taking public money to enrich executives. Clearly this cannot happen as literally years of volume don't add up to anything sizeable. interesting how the argument against investing is so fluid as to be contradictory. When the argument doesn't hold up that the company is in the wrong, simply go after its investors and make them look bad or criminal, starting with the one that has provided the most support.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
