Replies to post #9647 on T M M Inc (TMMI)

[4retire]

Jay, you posted: "And weren't you given your shares?. You have no complaint, do you?. Maybe you should of saved your shares instead of donating them to a worthless cause."

First of all the share float was expanded from 100mm to 750mm in 2007 by Corene King. I tried numerous times to get my shares and didn't receive them until 2012. I had to argue with a very rude person at TMMI for this to happen. Yeah, calling the company works really well. My shares weren't given, they were purchased in December 2000 and I received them 12 years later and five years after the increased float allowed them to be issued.

As far as your statement that I should have held my shares instead of giving them away, you assume way too much. I bought a good position in NVDA, INTC and EXC and have made between $3 to $6/share increase on these three stocks since. I would be up only $.11 currently on over half a million shares of TMMI that I sold during that same time. Yes, I'm really sorry that I didn't keep all of my position in TMMI. :-)

I don't worry about you guys or my remaining chunk for picker has all but guaranteed Big Bloomers in May (just don't know which year he's referring to).

[4retire]

Another gem from your post: "Deja Vu that was already settled in 2012, read the legal document!!." Where are you reading these legal documents? You admitted that you haven't gone to Las Vegas to view the trascripts and documents. Now this? Please explain.

The only document that I believe you're referring to in 2012 was the acqusisition of DFI by TMMI. If I were one of the other shareholders (and I wasn't) who held first... DFI shares, then DFMI shares, I would be suing TMMI, Simpson and Haskins for this chicanery.

In my opinion and based on the knowledge that I've gained, I don't know how they could have these millions of shares in DFI when DFI's charter as an S corp wouldn't even allow that many shares to be authorized. Secondly, there were over 29 other shareholders. Certainly the combined share count of those shareholders had to be large. Yet only two shareholders voted to sell to TMMI without tendering a quorum, or a vote from what TMMI, Simpson and Haskins must have deemed other shareholders inconsequential....at best, or just collateral damage, at worst.. That annoying corporate governance thingy might come in to bite them in the behind on this one.