News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Z-Axis

03/21/06 3:43 PM

#120469 RE: Sentinel #120465

But, Sentinal, what i'm ticked about is the wording from the Feb.10 PR vs. what has happened now. The reasons for not going thru with DVDave are justified, but the "..it has acquired.." wording is just wrong.

JF win = CC potential deal.
JF loses = don't have enough time to post'em.

¦¬)
icon url

Mar-Key

03/21/06 3:45 PM

#120473 RE: Sentinel #120465

You keep laughing...Im not! If something is not finalized it should not be released as a PR...did the Superbowl not prove this?
icon url

Rckhnd

03/21/06 3:46 PM

#120477 RE: Sentinel #120465

HAHAAAA!!! EXCELLENT observation! -E-
icon url

Chicagostock

03/21/06 3:59 PM

#120495 RE: Sentinel #120465

Right/


Although we saw the aquisition as a positive thing when it was announced, I don't think there was that much excitement anyway... There were many questions I noticed from the board asking how much did it cost us and if it was worth it for only so little subscribers... Deal falling through was some relief IMO because the cash we can use for distribution centers which is what I beleive they intend to do.

Notice 2 distribution centers now in Northeast (Maryland & Mass.) that will accomodate a northeast CC rollout
Florida distribution center, which will accomodate a southeast rollout with 46 CC stores in Florida alone.
California distribution center, which will accomadate a west side roll out with 85 CC stores in California alone.
IMO.

It is a possibility that CC came in and advised GNF that if they wanted to do any kind of rollout to not go through with the DVDavenue aquisitions and just focus on adding more distribution centers so that they can start rolling out in specific regions and get this show started. JMO. CC does not want a company running out of cash fast, who knows how much DVDAve would have costed them?
JMO