Replies to post #8726 on T M M Inc (TMMI)

[tmmi_fooled]

DFI NEVER owned the codec

Yes, there was a merger between DFI and the company it created DFMI

Comment: Where is the legal documentation to prove the merger legally ?

Yes, the merger is meaningless to any relevant issue (see above)


comment: The proof of merger is the most critical issue in this case, if proved that DFI and DFMI did merge legally, then DFMI is off the hook, otherwise ....



Yes, the Iterated lawyers in Dec 1996 said tmm owns NO Iterated technology rights



And you ask the point of the tmm web site information I posted? Same as the tmm news release I posted about tmm wanting to license the DFMI fractal codec.

Comment: At that time TMMIS probably did not know how DFMI get the fractal code

[Lax daddy]

Yes, there was a merger between DFI and the company it created DFMI

really because there is no public record of it anywhere.... there is no make believe letter of it at the court house either.


Yes, the merger is meaningless to any relevant issue (see above)

how can something that dimension has based their entire defense on be irrelevant?


Yes, the Iterated lawyers in Dec 1996 said tmm owns NO Iterated technology rights

tmmi owns 1.0-1.4 outright, paid in full... case has been ruled on and is not under discussion...

THEY DID NOT KNOW DFMI STOLE A CODEC FROM DFI, THAT IS THEIR LAWSUIT... YOU TRY TO POSTS MISTRUTHS AND LIE, THEN TRY TO SAY IT WONT MATTER BC OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS OR SAYING IT DOESNT matter ANYWAYS...

I AM NOT ONE OF YOU FOOLISH INVESTORS YOU ARE TRYING TO SOLICIT MONEY FROM, I CAN SEE THROUGH YOU SMOKE AND MIRRORS AND WOULD NEVER FALL FOR YOUR SCAM