No, I was just skirting that shorty has a problem in QASP issue.. Using a negative past to abuse a company whether legit or not is a very useful TOOL. The thought that it worked before is a common mistake that is made, as it doesn't always hold true. Lots of money is lost from that and some times even extreme amounts of money are lost when, a company pulls it's weight. What we are seeing and many heard today was just that. Donnell and Ms. Fransisco spelled it out. Gave notice so to speak. It is what is.. :-)
since you brought it up, she in fact cleared that up as well stating all D's are current and NO DILUTION! in fact she went a step further to state all she has said and worked on including the MJ deals can be verified as she has kept records for anyone can see what and who she spoke along with and all D's done! says she understands so many companies are being looked into she wants to make sure she has all ducks in a row, so all can be varified!!! So in fact the whole dilution thing was totally blown out of the water! Glad that was cleared up! she took care of ALL the bad info that has floating around! GREAT JOB DONNELL!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
