News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #25667 on Biotech Values
icon url

randychub

03/14/06 6:39 PM

#25668 RE: DewDiligence #25667

gtcb - Dew I agree.

They thought of doing a pipe while it was safe they also should have took care of this at that time, or the best option is wait until they deserve it.

This may provide a chance to get back in a blue light special prices.

R
icon url

DewDiligence

03/16/06 5:54 PM

#25809 RE: DewDiligence #25667

More on GTCB 2005/2006 compensation:

[A 5% salary overage for 2006 has been allotted to each executive officer provided that the company’s own cash balance at the end of 2006 is above an undisclosed threshold. I haven’t seen this kind of provision before and it strikes me as an undue incentive for the company to raise cash before year-end. Perhaps the threshold is so low that this provision doesn’t matter.]

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/904973/000090497306000007/form8-k.htm

>>
On March 10, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. determined the base salaries for 2006 for GTC’s executive officers, their annual stock option awards and their target bonus potential for 2006 expressed as a percentage of their respective base salaries. The Compensation Committee also determined bonuses awarded to GTC’s executive officers for the calendar year 2005. The bonuses were paid in a combination of cash and shares of GTC Common Stock valued at $1.03 per share, the closing price on March 10, 2006.

The Compensation Committee annually evaluates the performance and determines the cash and equity compensation of GTC’s executive officers based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of company performance and individual performance, as well as relative compensation for competitive positions in similarly sized, publicly-traded biopharmaceutical companies. Based on that evaluation and GTC’s recent developments and current financial position, t he Compensation Committee accepted management’s recommendation that there should be no increase in base salary levels for 2006 for each of the named executive officers. Instead of any increase in annual salaries, the Committee determined that, if GTC has a specified minimum cash balance at the end of 2006, there would be a cash payment in 2007 equal to 5% of the named executive officers’ respective base salaries.

The company performance portion of the bonus payments for 2005 was based on the Committee’s assessment of performance against a number of objectives in the areas of clinical development, transgenic production capabilities, external programs, business development and financial performance, and other performance goals established in early 2005. Given the extraordinary level of effort in 2005, including qualification of GTC's manufacturing facilities and its collaborative agreement established with LEO Pharma together with the focus on team performance to achieve GTC’s key goals for the year, the Committee determined that all the named executive officers should be awarded the same percentage amount for the portion of their bonuses that they achieved based on individual performance against objectives. Accordingly, the Committee awarded actual bonuses equal to approximately 79% of the target bonuses, which resulted in a bonus for Dr. Cox equal to approximately 31% of his base salary and bonuses for the other named executive officers equal to approximately 24% of their base salaries.

The Committee then granted annual stock option awards to each of GTC's executive officers. The size of stock option awards was generally intended to reflect the significance of the executive's current contributions to GTC's overall performance, and was determined based on the same matrix used in 2005. For each stock option award, 20% vested immediately and the balance vests 20% annually over four years. The exercise price per share of the stock options was equal to the fair market value of a share of GTC's Common Stock on the date of grant.

The Committee also determined the target bonus opportunity for each of the named executive officers for 2006 expressed as a percentage of base salary would remain unchanged from 2005. As was the case in 2005, this bonus potential can be exceeded by up to 20% of the target for exceptional corporate and individual performance. Also as was the case in 2005, the Compensation Committee will determine two-thirds of the bonus for the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers based on the Committee’s assessment of GTC’s performance relative to a number of company-wide goals established by the Committee. The remainder of the bonus potential will be based on the Committee’s judgment regarding individual performance against specific objectives.

The base salaries, annual equity awards and target bonuses for 2006, as well as the stock and cash bonuses for 2005, for GTC’s Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers, also known collectively as the named executive officers, are listed in Exhibit 10.1 [see below] and are incorporated herein by reference. Additional information on executive compensation is included in GTC’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders. [The proxy statement will be filed in April for the annual meeting .in May.]

The compensation table is here:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/904973/000090497306000007/ex10_1.htm
<<
icon url

DewDiligence

03/21/06 5:49 PM

#26007 RE: DewDiligence #25667

GTCB
Greg Liposky (SVP, Operations) sold 20K shares at $1.01 last Friday, according a Form-4 filed today. This is half of the 2005 bonus of roughly 40K shares Liposky received on March 10 (#msg-10161756).

GTC’s recent actions vis-à-vis bonuses and option grants are not helping the company reestablish credibility in the investment community (see my email in #msg-10161990). Further, although GTC has no direct control over what insiders do with their (unrestricted) shares, it will harm the company’s credibility even further if insiders make a habit of unloading shares at the current price.