News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Spanky227

05/04/14 9:47 AM

#66255 RE: es1 #66254

Es1,

Can you supply a link that proves anything in your post?

Everything I can see in your post is not accurate at all. The experts opinion will be released soon enough. Possibly this is the start of the pay streak they discussed during the last white channel update?

Anyone can see a 900% increase from sample 1 to sample 2 is VERY exciting and shows we have to get sample 3 to know if we can continue to see the improvement.

Its important to know what the actual facts are and not someone's made up numbers or guess. So please post a link that shows 200 tons mined. That's not accurate. Also show a link that shows after 2 small samples there is no reason to do a 3rd sample when sample 2 increases 900% from the 1st sample.

Glad we have actual experts at the Ruby.

Thanks
icon url

Spanky227

05/04/14 9:49 AM

#66256 RE: es1 #66254

Wouldn't everyone agree that a 900% increase in gold from sample 1 to sample 2 is phenomenal?

This is what you describe as failure?

I just can't understand that at all.
icon url

meltinglass

05/04/14 10:11 AM

#66257 RE: es1 #66254

Glad you think it's funny I just posted the photo for folks to see.
icon url

oldcoins50

05/04/14 8:44 PM

#66288 RE: es1 #66254


From what I understand when they were so called minign the White Channel it was to be mostly waste rock that was brought out . Waste rock due to expanding the opening of the white channel to be able to get in the area to actually work. So if they found GOLD then we are to be better , but if not , they have to open the area up to be able to move machines and tools in the White Channel to explore , to sample and to perhaps do some mining if it pans out.