HUH??? I expected better from you but that is the banner you operate under. So I will play along. That is not what I have witnessed at all in the past and even present. Now I believe that you are duct taping Jenna. But I will not and have not attack you on that except make a point. You selectively gag order selective. But that is your thread and you are the chair and by george according the concept of IHUB that is your right and I will stand behind you 100%.
I also realize that this is your banner for your refuting logic to get hits and traffic to the site. That is what I have a problem with mostly. You like the little bullies, stalkers and abrchy adovcates that come on a thread for the sole purpose to cause disrupt, assassinate, create havoc and most of all make stupid unacceptable accussations that have no merit what so ever or even an underlying basis for anything other than turmoil. But you want those post refuted.
Example you have a problem with the following and I will not do some absurd libel example as your gave, which I will address in the future.
A post comes on a stock site saying "This is a POS and all you pumpers will never get this going ... the only way it is going is down and there is nothing you hysters can do about it."
That post is a delete the minute it hits the thread. The only topic it has is a bias scenario maybe because it is an OTC.
Now you show me one just one underlying basis other than it is a post to cause havoc or is accussing anyone who is positive based on DD of being nothing more than a pumper or hypster. Of course there is nothing what so ever than anyone can discuss (the underlying basis) or can refute but a war breaks out and the damage is done. IF in the refute an innocent happens to go to far they will be suspended. The trap was set and sprung. This is exactly the tyranny that existed on SI with anarchy adovcates posting under your guide lines, they can basically cause enough disrupt that a target can be taken out. All they have to do is make a stragetically well payed word game. In some cases if is nothing more than a little poke like some bully in a school yard and when havoc breaks out goes "What?"
Because of your openly confessed bias of OTCs, I do not agree with you being over anything with OTCs. That is like putting a KKK member on the executive staff of the NAACP.
Heck again look at how you deal with Jenna for example on your own thread. That poor woman has tons of stalkers and harassers that are always making these very same type posts to get her going and cause disruption and you do nothing I see top them but you delete her posts. I have shaken my head numerous times and everytime you do this. But that is your thread that you chair and that is your decision. As unfair as I think the Q&A is, I do not war over there. You are the chair. If it eer brought before me I will support 100%. Because you are the chair and you control the flow of information there. Not me.
My point is you allow some to do and post anything they want and others you don't, and especially if the target refutes as you want them to and happens to possibly break a TOS in your opinion. But the anarchy adovcates have done their job and now look for another target.
That is why IHUB came into existence and I have watched the new SI moderators and so far they are like Jill. They have a lot to clean up if they ever expect to get posters back over there.
But your simplistic reasoning does not wash and that dog does not hunt. I am very much prepared for the deletions on a stock thread and to deal with your logic for allowing havoc mayhem and selective TOS as to why disruption is healthy for a stock and the flow of information on a thread.
:=) Gary Swancey
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
