News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #8981 on Rambus (RMBS)
icon url

long_in_cny

03/14/06 9:23 AM

#8982 RE: Threejack #8981

threejack,

re: <The fact Judge Jordan didn't transfer the case to Judge Whyte as Rambus requested> and < the fact he didn't simply enjoin Micron from proceeding with a RICO claim in Judge Payne's court>

The way I read the transcript, Judge Jordan hasn't decided EITHER issue. It appears that the briefings/responses back and forth aren't in yet for the venue change to NDCA, and MU's response on the motion to enjoin is due today with RMBS's counter coming back to the Judge tomorrow or so. Judge Jordan will consider BOTH at the same time.

It would be pretty easy for him to 1) send the case to Judge Whyte and 2) in the meantime, MU, stop the one in EDVA in one
fell swoop. If he does, it would be a major victory for RMBS.

Is he up to the task?
icon url

smd1234

03/14/06 10:29 AM

#8987 RE: Threejack #8981

TJ - I am behind in my reading if this has been decided. Can you help me w/ a link?

TIA

smd
===================
Judge Jordan didn't transfer the case to Judge Whyte as Rambus requested in an earlier motion, and will hear the case himself says to me he is neutral

icon url

msaba

03/14/06 10:33 AM

#8989 RE: Threejack #8981

Sorry have to intervene, LOL,

"The fact Judge Jordan didn't transfer the case to Judge Whyte as Rambus requested in an earlier motion, and will hear the case himself says to me he is neutral."

This is NOT, repeat NOT, true. He did not even get fully briefed yet on that motion, let alone make a decision.