I study the actions of the EPA and support LBSR. "Ironic" that you dis LBSR's progress, but seemingly support the mechinactions of the Gov./EPA. In my opinion, the sector and LBSR would be in better shape with a less "passive aggressive" EPA/Gov.
BTW: If there's no "baby" then why are you here? It takes logic to understand the lack of it. Or is it really a different reason for your stream of negative statements while supporting one of the reasons for sector stagnation (Gov./EPA)?
GLTA! - PR
P.S. The brilliant DD "from an article" that you constantly laud is really, as I've previously shown, from an anti-mining speech.