News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #25498 on Biotech Values
icon url

io_io

03/12/06 1:33 PM

#25542 RE: drbio45 #25498

dr_bio : "Does anyone know of cases when a company had fast track and didn't get priority review?"


I believe it happened only last week, to GNTA; they did not get priority review for CLL.

Here's when they filed, and you can see they had fast-track:


http://www.genta.com/Genta/InvestorRelation/2005/press_20051229.html
icon url

DewDiligence

03/12/06 6:18 PM

#25551 RE: drbio45 #25498

Re: Fast Track and Priority Review

>Myogen received fast track status…People confused that with priority review. They aren't supposed to have anything to do with each other.<

They are not completely unrelated. Fast Track has little importance per se, but it does make it more likely that a drug will get Priority Review because there is presumed to be an unmet medical need.

Priority Review without Fast Track is common. (Lucentis is the latest example.) Fast Track without Priority Review is rare; when it occurs, either there is something wrong with the drug or the unmet medical need has been met by another therapy since the Fast Track designation was awarded.

As has been noted on this board, news of a Fast Track award is often a good shorting opportunity because many investors think it means more than it does.
icon url

Biopharm investor

03/12/06 10:21 PM

#25560 RE: drbio45 #25498

drbio45, re: Priority Review

"Does anyone know of cases when a company had fast track and didn't get priority review?"

Genta's lead drug, Genasense, has Fast Track status and its CLL application did not get Priority Review.

[edit: sorry, I just saw that io_io already answered this]