News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BigFat

04/23/14 6:47 PM

#9258 RE: Helter Skelter #9252

LMAO! Please provide any point of law that would make this a problem for either company? Both Microelectrinics ( MELY) or Direct Capital?
Please provide concrete evidence that this is a real problem?
This sort of thing happens all the time. So please provide evidence to support your allegations that this is breaking the law?
icon url

Helter Skelter

04/23/14 6:59 PM

#9259 RE: Helter Skelter #9252

JON FULLENKAMP

Last known President of Direct Capital Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (revoked and expired).

Here's one of the MELY <> Direct Capital Group Inc.'s notes:

Direct Capital Group Note #10

On September 30, 2013 the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note with Direct Capital Group in the sum of $46,215. The promissory note is unsecured, bears interest at 8% per annum, and matures on April 1, 2014. The Conversion Price shall mean par .00001 multiplied by the number of Common Stock converted at the time. The transaction was handled as a private sale exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Link > MELY SEC FORM 10-Q FILED 02/19/2014

$46,215 @ $0.00001 (yes, 4 zeros) = 4,621,500,000 MELY shares (4.6 billion shares).

This is just one MELY <> Direct Capital Group note. There are many more (over 8 billion more shares worth, potentially, from my recollection).

Now, back to...

JON FULLENKAMP



Link > PUMPS and DUMPS