Data to compare? Compare to what? You are going around and around on this, asking the same inane question. I will say it one more time - the Parkinson samples collected from the so-called White Hills prospects have no documentation to say how they were collected, what material was collected, and where (exactly) they were collected. They have no geologic context, and are useless.
So, comparing those results to anything is useless.
I'll humor you again, though. Let's say that Parkinson was diligent and actually did a professional sampling job. Let's pretend he described where each sample was collected (not just the name of the claim), what kind of material was sampled, and GPS'd each point. Let's assume he did some basic geologic mapping. Let's say that he actually drew some conclusions about what the sample results meant, relative to the nature of the geology. All that would have been nice, but it didn't happen, did it? Well, even if he had done all those things, there is still no handy dandy benchmark "standard" to compare those results to.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
