How would I know what the samples and assays mean? I wasn't the geologist out there. That responsibility would fall on Parkinson's shoulders and the fake exploration company that hired him. That report he wrote was next to worthless - no geologic mapping, no interpretation of what the results meant, and he didn't bother even plotting individual samples on a map. Does he know how to use a GPS? Why didn't he sign/stamp the report?
What I would have found interesting would have been a detailed discussion of the drilling that Huskinson did 6 years ago on those very same claims. Surely Parkinson has access to that info - after all, it was all done for the same folks. GNCP has never disclosed the previous drilling results - why not? My guess is that the results were so crappy that disclosure would not be to their benefit.