Dave, I agree that this poster(s) did not come here to discuss or even remotely offer a solid opinion with an underlying basis. They refuse to offer an underlying basis as a matter of fact.
They came to make sly remarks and play a word game, which is off topic. One further expresses he is not about solid discussion only thread disruptions in his own words, "we the members going to stand up and poke holes in their little warm fuzzy balloons, and have a little fun along the way" which he has done historically, Disruption of threads. But as he posts further he believes this is a financial thread in "it is deadly to financial discussion in which all information and perception must be entered to ensure a full and balanced basis for analysis." I have no clue what that means here on the MY PERSONAL THREAD.
However, the point is he is out to challenge the IHUB Principal & moderation (censorship) and to disrupt where ever he can as cleverly as he can. So after walking away for an hour or so and thinking carefully I agree because of the challenge to Bob and questioning certain scenarios the concept of IHUB moderated thread is all this is about.
In conclusion I like you feel these posters are here solely to disrupt. I will delete all this mess and delete any further posts by these particular gentlemen on this thread. This is not a financial site but{b} my personal site{/b} and I do not have to take this type of underhandness.
If they want to challenge the IHUB concept then they can create their own personal threads or to the parking lot.
:=) Gary Swancey
