Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[seabass]

>>>Perhaps it is because there is nothing but liberal hot air behind the accusations you and other lefties believe as gospel while espousing "innocent until proven guilty" for all terrorists and criminals. Don't you think that after a campaign for governor of Texas and a campaign for the president of the US, if there was any provable misdeeds there the dems would have gone hyperbolic in getting it out????<<<

Bush has had ample time to defend himself and shed daylight on the questions about his military record but has chosen not to. Accounts of him being AWOL during much of 1972 and 1973 are plentiful and consistent while little or no reporting has been done to dispute those charges. Rather than using the standard GOP Clinton/Gore rebuttal, why not prove that the AWOL accusations against Bush are false? If this amounts to nothing but "liberal hot air", then certainly a simple Google search should make your case for you. As for Bill Clinton, he's in good company with droves of draft dodging, high ranking republicans, and how does Al Gore's service record even merit comparison with charges of desertion?
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/campaign2000/news/One_year_gap_in_Bush_s_Guard_duty+.shtml