Well, I respect that you give the company the benefit of the doubt Mr. Owl, but do you believe there is any chance at all that the company and/or the company CEO was just plain full of it?
I truly believe you are indeed much wiser than me, and most others here on the Exobox Boards, and I'm starting to think you may have never been "burned" before so to speak by a penny stock company or by a reverse merger deal or by a reverse split.
Regardless, do you believe there's any chance at all that the company CEO may have made incorrect representations to shareholders for the simple reason as so to placate EXBX shareholders long enough so he can execute this SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT?
Have you ever been a witness to any other pink sheet company in which that company almost totally wipes out the shareholders' stock equity and/or stock market value by effecting a huge reverse split (let's say 1-for-2000), only to re-issue more stock to themselves and their cohorts?
Mr. Owl if you have my contact info, I would be happy to share with you the representations the company CEO made to me in regards to this proposed SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT. Maybe we can compare those representations to the recent 8-K filings.
Personally, I think I know the reason why the company didn't disclose any SB2 info.
Personally, I think I know why the company didn't do a great job of explaining certain things in their public releases.
Personally, I think I know why the company wasn't more clear on everything.
Last question for now Mr. Owl, according to the recent 8-Ks that you have read in regards to this proposed SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT, do you believe there is any chance that the company simply wanted to "reorganize" EXBX shareholders right off the OTC Pink Sheets, while reverse merging this new PDX company onto the stock exchange, while only giving current EXBX shareholders an incredibly small fraction of this new publicly traded PDX company? Could this have been a possibility at all in your opinion??
Go EXBX !!
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
