It’s easy for people to say that the whole two-year review process was BS and the application never had a chance to be approved for political reasons. I respectfully disagree. With more patients and no alteration in the dosing protocol, I think the application would have breezed through, politics and all.
We will never *know* for any drug whatsoever that it was rejected just for being a gmo. Unless someone confesses. Because drug applications are so enormously complex that you can *always* find something 'wrong'. What would it take to convince you that this was a political decision?