InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 555
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2004

Re: docrew0 post# 8325

Thursday, 02/23/2006 10:05:16 PM

Thursday, February 23, 2006 10:05:16 PM

Post# of 17023
Given the cases just filed in VA and Italy, I don't understand why Rambus would stipulate to give MU more time:

Micron Technology v. Rambus Inc. Docket 716
U.S. District Court
District of Delaware (Wilmington)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-00792-KAJ


02/23/2006 716 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file and serve its answering papers in opposition to Rambus Inc.'s Motion to Transfer the Case to the Northern District of California and respond to Rambus' Amended Counterclaims and the time within which Rambus must serve and file its reply papers in connection with its motion to transfer to March 15, 2006 and March 29, 2006, respectively - filed by Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc.. (King, Matthew) (Entered: 02/23/2006)

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News