News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257295
Next 10
Followers 1
Posts 626
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/16/2005

Re: DewDiligence post# 24542

Thursday, 02/23/2006 7:12:58 PM

Thursday, February 23, 2006 7:12:58 PM

Post# of 257295
"Not exactly—it’s the difference in dosing between the pregnancy cases and the surgery cases that caused the problem. However, none of this has anything to do with ATryn per se; the same variation in dosing would occur with plasma-derived antithrombin."

OK I've thought about this and now I don't get anything. This issue, the difference in the dosing was in the first submission. So what was the 2 years consideration including 2 delays about? The size of the surgical portion of the trial was known at first submission. None of this makes any sense. The only explanation I have seen that fits all the facts neatly is that they were concerned about transgenics, period. I really don't like to think that.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today