News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257473
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122916
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: n4807g post# 24345

Tuesday, 02/21/2006 8:09:33 PM

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:09:33 PM

Post# of 257473
Re: INGN

>Maybe this will help<

Actually, the PR you cited from June raises even more questions:

>>
To date,12 patients (66.7 percent) had objective responses or tumor reduction greater than 50%. Historically the expected objective response rate in these patients is between 20 and 30 percent.

<<

In the June PR the response rate was reported as 66.7% (12/18), but in today’s PR the RR is reported as 62% (with no patient count).

Moreover, in the June PR it said that the historical response rate on second-line chemo is 20-30%, but in today’s PR it says that the historical RR is 5-25%.

I don’t get it.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today