Trying to rationalize theft:
If Neuro believes that he would not buy cable otherwise, but might as well enjoy it if its "free", and if I believe that I would not have purchased those additional movie tickets otherwise, but might as well enjoy viewing the movies if they are "free", then what have I or Neuro stolen? That is, if there is no opportunity cost, there is no cost at all. - Spall
It seems you have unilaterally determined that because the cost to the provider of services that you are using without authorization is minimal or non-existent, there is no theft. It's just a fancy justification for theft. Granted, it's a small thing, but it's still basically theft and it's wrong. In your example, Spall, you are also committing trespass when you remain to see the second movie for which you haven't paid. Frankly, I'm a little surprised by your disregard for private property rights. ;)