Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,782.81
(
2.51%
)
US TECH 100
24,184.80
(
2.72%
)
Dow Jones
47,909.92
(
2.85%
)
Brent Oil
94.84
(
-6.30%
)
Bitcoin
71,310.86
(
-0.94%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 6903
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

tecate

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 6
Posts 9853
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/02/2002

tecate

Re: rlweitz post# 1948

Saturday, 02/18/2006 10:26:14 PM

Saturday, February 18, 2006 10:26:14 PM

Post# of 6903
Well, being that Intel showed up so late to the x86-64 game they really didn't have a choice. The initial iteration of Yamhill was disabled in Prescott due to it's x86-64 incompatibilities

Well that's your opinion, given the speed of microsoft and thier OS, I'd say they showed up right on time and why not use AMD's extensions, didn't AMD use Intel's? alls fair and heck it was good management. :)
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today