The Question and Answer Board

[gotmilk]

chwdrhed & Susie called gotmilk lowest of yucky lows

Message In Reply To:
... give an opinion [on] someone posting publicly
the contents of a private message... [stop.]

Ya'up, #msg-624557
The Lounge / The Sheriff's Office / The Jailhouse (JAIL)
Posted by: gotmilk
In reply to: WTMHouston
Date: 14 Dec 2002
"... not kosher [to] post PMs... it has nothing to do
with anything meaningful here... ain't the issue.
Focus on the real issue(s). Nuff for now...... Troy[end.]
(iHub Reference)
Private Messages: ... Our policy is that we will not deliver
the contents of private messages to anyone... [stop.]
Troy, The
"[iHub, a.k.a. Bob & Matt] will not deliver Private Messages"
is a sentence fragmint that reminds me of my limitations
to contruck propeller Englsih words together in harmingie.
For example,
"we will not deliver the contents of private messages to anyone"
says that eventhought you can send and receive PMs,
iHub will not deliver them to you. As in you can place a letter
into a US Mailbox, but the post office will not deliver it.
The interpretation being used on this board for
"[iHub's] policy is that we will not deliver the contents
of private messages to anyone"
is in error when one says that Matt violated the clause.
The "will not deliver the contents" has a clear meaning
to folks who have an ability to read & understand above
what has been demo'ed on this Jailhouse board in regard
to saying Matt broke that promise.
The meaning of "will not deliver the contents" is iHub's stand
for the situation that a person being an iHub member or not
asks iHub to display or send them a PM made by a person
not of themselves, during a time frame and set of conditions.
What iHub members do with PMs they have received
and have access to in their mailbox or archieve is not part
of the Terms of Use agreement.
As for why is simply, PMs are a function of Trust & Respect.
___________________________________________________
Si's Doug AK
gotmilk & skunk cabbage, no Zurnip or Krispy Kreme