News Focus
News Focus
Followers 204
Posts 46333
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: Anvil post# 45270

Monday, 02/17/2014 10:59:02 PM

Monday, February 17, 2014 10:59:02 PM

Post# of 227203
It's not the number of holes that is the problem here. Eight holes is actually not a bad number for a first look at a mineral prospect. The problem is that the drilling was not done for GNCP, they have not disclosed where the holes were drilled, there are no maps, no geological reports, and no assays for 6 of the 8 holes.

And, to make matters worse, the assays for the two holes they did release are abysmal....(i.e, the results sucked). No wonder no additional work has been done on those claims in the past five years.

GNCP is great at promoting claims that they have never explored, and they don't seem to know where they are. White Hills? The few claims we know about (Dandy, Mocking Bird, etc.) are in the Black Mountains, a good 10 or 15 miles away.

And now they want to do radar mapping to find veins down to millimeter size......?? WTF!?? Lumb must believe his investors will fall for anything.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y