Followers | 121 |
Posts | 4895 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 11/11/2006 |
Sunday, February 16, 2014 6:44:33 PM
I can't help wonder why they would do that? Seems to me location wouldn't be important. Locating to NY and LA has to be a very expensive proposition, wouldn't you think? I can see thousands a month in each location just for rent, not counting the extremely high cost of living and for what? What am I missing here? Is this just another bad decision by our CEO or are there advantages I am unaware of?
Recent HHSE News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/05/2024 07:17:02 PM
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM