InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 9
Posts 4835
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/30/2000

Re: docrew0 post# 8017

Wednesday, 02/15/2006 6:50:00 AM

Wednesday, February 15, 2006 6:50:00 AM

Post# of 17023
re: Micron Technology v. Rambus Inc. Docket 714 file links


Docrew,

Great stuff, thanks for posting. The host server works fine; loaded the pdfs in no time.

Agree with NicdaGreek, the Rambus brief on transferring the Micron case to Judge Whyte is very compelling. Won't surprise me one little bit if he agrees to the transfer. Nice chart in the brief on the patents and claims involved in each of the litigations. Perhaps will aid the discussion between calbiker and JMONTIM.

Reading the Exhibits like a trip down memory lane, having been around since the beginning of the litigations. Have to say, the tone to Judge Whyte's remarks to counsel about the need for a business resolution to the litigations seemed squarely aimed at Rambus and, by implication, Micron. My inference is Samsung and Hynix were at least involved in settlement discussions with Rambus. Seems personal between Micron and Rambus, but maybe my imagination. Mr. Hughes has no history with Mr. Appleton relative to Rambus, does he?

Also struck by the tone of Judge Whyte's remarks about Judge Payne's decision on the unclean hands issue and potential at the time to retain the Samsung case. Seemed more willing to defer to Judge Payne than I previously thought. No wonder Rambus surrendered its patents at suit to escape Judge Payne. Think Judge Whyte might have let him proceed to make a further mess of things.

Just my opinion.

Threejack
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News